While residential landlords in Arizona face a long list of statutory disclosure requirements, commercial landlords have far fewer state-mandated disclosures under the Arizona Revised Statutes (effective since 1901). Because commercial tenants are considered sophisticated parties, courts rely heavily on the principle of caveat emptor (let the buyer/lessee beware) and the specific terms negotiated in the lease agreement.

However, commercial landlords are not entirely free from disclosure obligations. They must operate under the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, meaning they cannot actively conceal crucial information.

Official Law Citation: General commercial tenancies are governed by Arizona Revised Statutes Title 33, Chapter 3 (Landlord and Tenant)Preview unavailable, as the Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (ARLTA)Preview unavailable explicitly excludes commercial properties.

Common Law and Active Concealment

In the absence of a comprehensive commercial disclosure statute, Arizona courts apply Common Law principles to determine a landlord's disclosure obligations. The most significant of these is the duty to disclose "material facts."

A fact is material if a reasonable person would attach importance to it when deciding whether to lease the property. Under the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, a landlord cannot actively conceal a known defect or issue that would significantly impact the tenant's intended use of the property.

Examples of potentially material facts include:

• Zoning Issues: If the landlord has actual knowledge that the tenant's intended business use is prohibited by local zoning ordinances, failure to disclose this may lead to liability.
• Structural Defects: Known, latent (hidden) defects that render the property unsafe or unusable for the intended commercial purpose.
• Environmental Hazards: Knowledge of soil contamination, asbestos, or other severe environmental issues that are not readily apparent upon inspection.

If a landlord fraudulently conceals a material defect they knew about at the time the lease was signed, they can be held liable for damages, even if the lease includes an "as is" clause.

The "As-Is" Clause

Many Arizona commercial leases include an "As-Is" clause, stating the tenant accepts the property in its current condition with no warranties from the landlord. While these clauses are generally enforceable between commercial parties and place the burden of due diligence on the tenant, they do not protect a landlord who commits outright fraud or intentionally conceals a known, dangerous material defect.

Best Practices for Commercial Landlords

To minimize risk and a positive landlord-tenant relationship, consider these best practices regarding disclosures:

1. Be Transparent: While not legally required to point out every minor flaw, disclosing significant, known issues upfront prevents costly litigation later.
2. Require Tenant Due Diligence: Ensure the lease explicitly states that the tenant has inspected the property, verified zoning compliance for their intended use, and accepts the premises based on their own investigation.
3. Use Specific Disclaimers: If the landlord is unsure about certain condition (e.g., the roof), explicitly disclaim any warranty regarding that condition in the lease.

How Landager Can Help

Keep track of all property inspections, due diligence documents, and signed lease agreements securely within Landager's platform. Landager helps you maintain a clear record of disclosures provided to your commercial tenants in Arizona.

How Landager Helps

Landager tracks lease terms, required compliance items, and accounting records - making it easy to stay compliant with Arizona regulations.

Back to Arizona Landlord-Tenant Laws OverviewPreview unavailable.